Comrades in Action
Posted on July 2nd, 2008
EDIT: This has got to be the most difficult situation in my life ever. Well, not that bad but had to ponder a lot before doing so.
Before reading on and clicking on the “READ MORE” button below, you must agree that you are “OK” with little girls being touched by teddy bears. You must also agree that your country isn’t going to catch you for possessing such image. If they are, tell them that this image is found thru Google and not this blog. (I GOT IT THRU GOOGLE!! @SSHOLES!!)
To ffsteve: If you or the government of your country can’t accept such indecency, do not visit this blog ever again. I wouldn’t mind. Btw: If this post alone is gonna generate lots of real life pedophiles, then your site is gonna generate tons of dangerous people. Just because you aren’t into (quote from your site) “…creepy young lolicon” (it’s lolis btw. Lolicons are people with a loli complex, thus the name. Research before you make a post), doesn’t mean others aren’t. Good warning at the beginning though. 
To AndyH: I respect you for being a good, if not great 3D artist. I have tried it before, but isn’t successful in the 3D field. Yes, it’s not cool to be called a paedo (pedo) in real life, but in the net, it’s a different case. I’m not a real life pedo myself. I go for adults. Pedo is just a term for fun. Yes, you read it, FUN!! Real life is a stress, and many people want to relieve of it. They make a comedy out of themselves, hoping others like it. Apparently, you and ffsteve don’t. Which, I really wouldn’t mind. ^_^ (I hope no flame was done/ignited cos it will worsen global warming.)
With that said,
Recently, I have turned into a pedobear and one of my comrades sent me this image:
Just in case you think this brunette loli is the victim here, SHE’S NOT!! The victim here is the large comrade of mine behind her. The loli managed to slam him to the back. However, with the athletic ability of my comrade, he managed to land on his 2 pedofeet and survived the attack!! That was when the smaller comrade came in and suppress the loli. Thus, the shock look!!
Thanks to Danny, Panther, and Clan Blue. LOL
P.S: I remember commenting on dc.com that if someone will to come to my site and make a ruckus, I would shout back at him saying “This is my site and I govern it! GTFO if you aren’t happy with it!!” Apparently, it’s air talk. T_T But I’ll learn this crap/shit/lesson nicely. ^o^ Have a nice day~
10 Responses to “Comrades in Action”
-
yumeno Says:
July 2nd, 2008 at 10:13 pmLOL! “They come in pairs”.
-
Panther Says:
July 3rd, 2008 at 1:11 amNow all you need is the 3000×3000 Pedobear seal.
-
Tiny Red Man Says:
July 3rd, 2008 at 1:44 am@panther: I already have it =D
-
gordon Says:
July 5th, 2008 at 2:02 ami wish u all the best in your new career. (’~')
-
Blowfish Says:
July 5th, 2008 at 5:25 amSo youre a Pedobear approved Guy?
Congrats! -
Danny Choo Says:
July 9th, 2008 at 12:08 pmI miss your pedo bear avatar on dc.com
-
tragic comedy Says:
July 9th, 2008 at 5:52 pmDont you just love this kind of reactionary posts?
dorama at its best! -
Steve Says:
July 10th, 2008 at 8:27 amI agree this has got out of hand. I would have cleared this up at dc, but he killed my account! In hindsight I should have posted here rather than there anyway. To answer various points:
- I’ve since viewed a ton of Pedobear images. Of all of them, I only react strongly to the one posted here. Why? Because it is a picture of real human pre-teen girl actually being abused. I don’t mean abused by the teddy bears. I mean abused by whoever took the picture. So I see her as a victim.
- I believe that she continues to be victimized every time that image is propagated.
- I believe it is possible to abuse a child without involving nudity.
- I arrived at those beliefs all by myself without researching the laws of various countries, which I see as irrelevant to my beliefs.
- I don’t believe that you intentionally intended harm to that girl by posting the image.
- I don’t believe that appearing in a Google image search has any relevance to whether an image is worthy or not.
- I have no opinion about the pictures being removed from art galleries in Australia. I mentioned the situation to illustrate what is happening in the real world relating to images which many regard as having artistic merit. And I stated that they were much less offensive than the image above.
- I never claimed that your site creates pedophiles. I objected to the image.
- I never claimed that you were a pedophile. I objected to the image.
- I never thought that it was you who created the image.
- I don’t think the images on my site are in the same category. They are photographs of sexy plastic dolls. None of which look prepubescent. No human was harmed in the production of those photos.
- If some smart alec proves that the teddy bears were photoshopped into the image, then the girl’s pose still presents a problem for me. Did they remove humans from the picture and put bears in? That’s even worse!
- I’m not new to the Internet and I’m not a wowser. I genuinely think that the image above is an exceptional case.
- I didn’t say “figures of lolicons”, I said “lolicon figures”. There is a semantic difference and I don’t think it’s worth picking on.
- I feel very upset too . Conflicts on the Internet can be worse than in real life not least because
of the delay in getting a response, which gives you time to stew. Plus, I spent days rewriting my
site so that the dc feed wouldn’t slow down the loading time. That’s all wasted now.- I don’t regret posting. Sometimes you need a wake-up call. That goes both ways. I’m now seriously thinking about whether I want to be involved in the otaku scene, which seems to involve lots of slippery slopes.
- Thanks for the link. I’m afraid I can’t reciprocate while that image remains here.
- Phew!
-
Tiny Red Man Says:
July 10th, 2008 at 11:48 am@steve: Long comment….I’ll take my time to understand what u meant..BTW: Do not forget to clear your cache in case the govt comes and arrest you.
Hiaz….Thx for the wake up call. But it seems to me that the pre-teen girl, like you said, looks a bit suggestive. I posted the image here becos I know that from her facial expression, to the way the bears are pose, she’s having fun. No, really. One look and you know, no harm is done to her. To some, this might look a bit sick, but not for the “victim”.
And I personally WILL NOT watch naked adults, aka porn for the rest of my life, let alone naked little girls.. It’s against my beliefs. And referring my personal belief to the above image, she really looks like she’s having fun. I’m not sure about it, but…ya. And i agree that ur site is “NO HUMAN HARM” kinda site. I will edit the post to make it sound more…acceptable.
Hey, I copied and pasted figures of lolicons from your site!!
And i’m kinda sorry to hear the probs that occur to you. If you have a prob with this post, email me and not leave a comment here. this way, no image is accidently stored on your com.
I’m trying to avoid conflict here.
-
Steve Says:
July 10th, 2008 at 1:09 pmWell, just let me add one more line to my manifesto above, and then you’ll hopefully see where I’m coming from. Then I’ll leave you alone.
- I believe that it is possible to abuse a child without the child knowing it at the time. When she grows up she’ll still be the “pedobear girl” and there’s a chance she’ll no longer think it’s fun.
Also, you missed my point about “lolicon figures” versus “figures of lolicons”. But it’s a trivial point anyway.
Peace.
